News & Events

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.

General

Calling All Landowners, Property managers, and Snow Removal Contractors! Critical Changes in Colorado Indemnity Law for Snow Removal Work

There is a new change afoot in Colorado law directly impacting anyone involved in the property maintenance, commercial real estate management, snow removal, or general liability insurance industries.  More specifically, Senate Bill 62 (the “Snow Removal Service Liability Limitation Act”), passed and signed by Governor Hickenlooper, has now been codified at C.R.S. § 13-21-129. It is important to note that this statute applies to all snow/ice removal contracts entered into on or after August 8, 2018. 

Under Colorado’s collateral source rule (C.R.S. §§ 10-1-135(10)(a) and 13-21-111.6), when an injured plaintiff receives compensation for their loss from a source other than the defendant, the court must reduce the amount of awarded to the plaintiff by the amount received from the collateral source. 
 
For example, if the plaintiff’s wealthy aunt or uncle paid the medical bills incurred by the plaintiff after an accident, the court will reduce the verdict against the defendant by the amount paid by the aunt or uncle.  This prevents a windfall to the plaintiff. 
 
However, this rule does not apply if the money comes to the plaintiff as a result of a contract he/she entered into – such as an insurance policy. 
 
The Court of Appeals has now officially expanded this “contract exception” to the collateral source rule to include payments made by Medicare.  The Court also affirmed prior case law placing similar payments from Medicaid and Social Security under this exception.  The case, Forfar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2018 COA 125, will be considered for certiorari by the Colorado Supreme Court, but as of today, payments from Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security cannot be used to reduce the verdict amount payable to a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit. 
 
For more information, please contact Steve Phillips at (303) 894-8948.

Hits: 68

Choosing a structure for your business is a highly personal decision, specific to each enterprise. In general, any type of business needs to have two considerations at the top of its list when determining what structure is best: tax implications and liability.

The landmark decision of Fisher v. State Farm, decided by the Colorado Court of Appeals in May 2015, had a significant impact on bad faith litigation in our state. Now three years later, the Colorado Supreme Court has finally weighed in, ultimately ruling that if a portion of an insured's claim is not in dispute, the undisputed portion must be paid even if other portions of the claim are in dispute. This decision has widespread impact for the insurance industry from the adjusters to the carriers and of course for insureds.

Documenting all of your employment practices—including hiring, promotion, and firing processes—is a good idea for many reasons, starting with providing your business a firm grasp of your objectives and your employees a clear roadmap to follow.

Zupkus & Angell, P.C.
789 Sherman Street
Suite 500
Denver, CO 80203
303.894.8948 (voice)
303.894.0104 (fax)
Terms and Conditions | Sitemap
© Copyright 2018 Zupkus and Angell
Attorney Web Design by Legal Web Design